My think­ing and eve­ry­thing I per­ceive is no longer cre­ated else­where – more or less over the top of my head –, but it de­vel­ops here through my in­ner or­gan of speech, through my speak­ing. Here at last I un­der­stand the state­ment from my own ex­peri­ence:
“In the be­gin­ning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God. In the be­gin­ning it was with God. Eve­ry­thing was cre­ated through the word, and with­out the word noth­ing was cre­ated what has be­come. In it was life, and this life was the light of man­kind.”
– ac­cord­ing to the state of de­vel­op­ment of aware­ness and/or un­fold­ment of aware­ness.

Of course, it goes with­out say­ing that all this can only be ex­peri­enced af­ter that ab­so­lu­te sound bar­rier of the civi­lised world has been bro­ken: deep sleep.
It is in­ter­est­ing to ex­peri­ence how the in­ner or­gan of speech works, how it cre­ates the au­di­ble, that what is to be tasted, to be smelt or the visi­ble – pre­cisely: those ele­ments that were on vari­ous oc­ca­sions dis­cussed at this con­fer­ence.

Whilst I think in my dream and/or I re­al­ise: oh, I am run­ning around, I see this and that, I hear this and that, I smell one thing and the other, or I taste many things, whilst I go out to eat in my dream – I al­ways re­al­ise: the crea­tor of all this is my in­ner or­gan of speech.

It is in­ter­est­ing that the Bi­ble and other holy scrip­tures say: God spoke and cre­ated – he cre­ated the world through his word.
Af­ter break­ing through the third main state of con­scious­ness – that ab­so­lu­te sound bar­rier of the civi­lised world: deep sleep, we re­al­ise more and more clearly: we cre­ate our en­tire think­ing through speak­ing – noth­ing else. Our speak­ing abil­ity, our or­gan of speech is suf­fi­cient to bring forth our en­tire think­ing: to con­jure it up in our mind in full splen­dour. There is noth­ing we may think that we have not cre­ated inside with our in­ner voice – quite con­trary to our outer voice.

And it looks as if from here we can learn to un­der­stand the origi­nal natu­ral mean­ing of the struc­ture of a sound.

When I per­son­ally ex­peri­ence the struc­ture of a tone and/or a sound or word, then I quite often grasp the origi­nal natu­ral mean­ing of this sound and/or word.
But I am not the only one with this abil­ity, I know oth­ers who are de­vel­op­ing this abil­ity – be­cause nowa­days we can learn such a thing again.

But also in his­tory there have been peo­ple again and again, who, when hear­ing a sound and/or a word, im­me­di­ately knew what it meant: meant origi­nally.
We are not talk­ing about a lan­guage, as we know or assess it to­day. So it is not like Chi­nese or Eng­lish – we are only talk­ing about the struc­ture of a sound, which has its natu­ral origi­nal mean­ing in it­self – such as the body the soul, which we can ex­peri­ence and grasp.

And we can ex­peri­ence and grasp this lan­guage struc­ture with all senses, and proof for this as an arche­typal ex­ample is: our dream.

But fun­da­men­tally, it is no dif­fer­ent in the state of wake­ful­ness. For also in wakeful consciousness our think­ing fol­lows the same cos­mic laws as in our dream con­scious­ness.
The only dif­fer­ence – as far as think­ing as such is con­cerned – is that we are awake and also dream­ing.

But our think­ing proc­ess is the same with re­gard to its mecha­nism.
Na­ture did not have to pro­duce two dif­fer­ent things – but one mecha­nism regu­lates both as­pects of think­ing in the wake­ful con­scious­ness and dream con­scious­ness.